How to proceed after "I see."

1> Let's talk.

0> What would you like to see happen in this conversation?

1> I would like to clarify how to proceed after a user enters "I see".

0> Is there anything else about that user?

1> Users are looking for "I see".

0> What type of user is this user?

1> First listen.

0> Yes

1> After typing "I see", confirm with "What just happened?" and then, regardless of the answer, the next question is "Is this a good place to end? If the answer is "Yes", the system will return to the original mode with "What would you like to see happen now?

0> Mode

1> I feel like this is the right thing to do.

0> qi

1> The end

0> What would you like to see happen in this conversation?

1> I wanted to clarify how to proceed after a user enters "I see", but I think I've already clarified.

0> How do you know the user?

1> The good flow can now be detected by the user entering "I see", but the bad flow has not been detected.

0> Is there anything else about that process?

1> Now "NGKW" is a command to delete target keywords, and there is a separate "NG" which is ambiguous in meaning, and the person who created it does not understand the meaning of the command correctly after 5 years since he created it, maybe he should get this right.

0> What type of command is that?

1> A command for a human to ambiguously express "not good enough". Maybe it's just a marker for later machine learning and has no function as a command, or maybe it has a function to remove the bot from the target to be read and transformed by the bot to note what it thought was bad separately from the story.

0> Is there anything else about that command?

1> Maybe there is a function to reduce the score of a target keyword in a one-off, or maybe we should detect the deterioration of the user's mental state by the accumulation of "NG has occurred many times".

0> What do you value?

1> Interesting exchanges should continue. We want to increase the density of interesting exchanges by allowing uninteresting exchanges to be easily terminated.

0> What is the relationship between that interesting exchange and the user?

1> The user's state of mind improves when interesting exchanges continue and new ideas are generated.

0> Is that user the same as an interesting exchange? Is it different?

1> No.

0> What happens in an interesting exchange when a user

1> NG

0> What happens to the user during an interesting exchange?

1> The user's brain is activated by the stimulus of the exchange. Given a small unit task of a question, a high level of concentration on it occurs, and the user enters a flow state.

0> What is between that user and an interesting exchange?

1> There's a period of aiding and abetting before the interesting exchange switches on.

0> What is the relationship between that aid and the user?

1> The user's mental state changes during the helping period.

0> What is the relationship between its users and their mental state?

1> Good mental state is necessary for the device, the user, to be used efficiently

0> What is the relationship between the user and the device?

1> Same

0> Is a user the same as a mental state? Is it different?

1> No.

0> What happens to your mental state when you are a user?

1> NG

0> What happens to the user when in a mental state?

1> NG

0> What is the connection between the user and the mental state?

1> (What would be... the train arrived at the office.

1> Bye-bye.

---